{"id":10807,"date":"2014-12-05T17:41:47","date_gmt":"2014-12-05T17:41:47","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.watchmanmedia.org\/?p=10807"},"modified":"2022-02-20T19:27:22","modified_gmt":"2022-02-20T19:27:22","slug":"covert-vaccines-endgame-war-weak-create-master-race","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/watchmanmedia.org\/?p=10807","title":{"rendered":"A Covert Vaccines Endgame War against the Weak"},"content":{"rendered":"

Tetanus vaccines that were given to millions of young women in Kenya have been confirmed by laboratories to contain a sterilization chemical that causes miscarriages, reports the Kenya Catholic Doctors Association, a pro-vaccine organization.<\/span><\/p>\n

Should we surprised at what the UN is doing after all the\u00a0 same body has publicly released a controversial report<\/span>\u00a0<\/a> (which has now been removed) claiming that the African population of Kenya is too large and growing too quickly. Therefore to deal with the \u201cchallenge\u201d is how to reduce the continued high demand for children\u201d by turning contraceptives into tetanus vaccines for the poor.<\/span><\/p>\n

The report says that one issue surrounds the realization of the policy objective of reducing Total Fertility Rate (TFR) from the current level of 4.6 to 2.6 children per woman by 2030. This is because the demand for children is still high and is unlikely to change unless substantial change in desired family sizes are achieved.<\/span><\/p>\n

The 338-page report <\/a><\/span>doesn\u2019t explicitly call for abortion. However as we know the language used in such reports is very appealing, but the truth is that the global elite are so obsessed with controlling the population that they want only a few slaves they will be able to control in their utopian New World Disorder.<\/span><\/p>\n

Another common theme throughout the report on Kenya is the alleged \u201cneed\u201d to prod women into delaying marriage, family, and child-bearing. Despite dramatic declines in fertility over recent decades \u2014 authorities must do much more to bring the population down to \u201cdesirable\u201d levels.<\/span><\/p>\n

How do they intend to achieve that goal? According to the report:<\/span><\/p>\n

\n

The achievement of lower fertility is complicated by differences between individual fertility preferences and desirable fertility levels….Investing, educating and contributing to the attainment of more favourable demographic indicators….lower fertility through enhanced contraceptive use…lower ideal family sizes and getting more women into the workforce using government \u2013mandated changes in gender roles as a way to ensure few African babies…..Sustainable development requires Kenya to be in a position to proactively address, rather than only react to, the population trends that will unfold over the next decades.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

This is all brainwashing Kenyan women into having fewer children. In other words the UN and its African puppets know better than African families. To make matters even worse, it is the developing nations that are the main target. <\/span><\/p>\n

For instance, one of the reports of the United Nations Population Division Policy Brief<\/a><\/span> dated in March 2009 starts with the following unbelievable statement:<\/span><\/p>\n

\n

What would it take to accelerate fertility decline in the least developed countries?<\/span><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

The less developed regions include all the countries and areas of the world except Australia, Canada, Japan, New Zealand, the United States of America, and all the Western countries in Europe. The group of least developed countries (LDCs) includes the forty-nine countries designated as such by the General Assembly. <\/span><\/p>\n

The rest of the countries in the less developed regions, as a group, are designated by the term developing countries.<\/span><\/p>\n

The document is packed with references to \u201creproductive health\u201d and \u201creproductive rights\u201d As then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton<\/a><\/span> said during a political controversy in Canada on the issue:<\/span><\/p>\n

\n

I\u2019ve worked in this area for many years, and if we\u2019re talking about maternal health, you cannot have maternal health without reproductive health. And reproductive health includes contraception and family planning and access to legal, “safe abortion.”<\/span><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

Many critics are demanding action for these atrocities on African women. Dr. Ngare, spokesman for the Kenya Catholic Doctors Association, stated in a bulletin released November 4,<\/span><\/p>\n

“This proved right our worst fears; that this WHO campaign is not about eradicating neonatal tetanus but a well-coordinated forceful population control mass sterilization exercise using a proven fertility regulating vaccine. This evidence was presented to the Ministry of Health before the third round of immunization but was ignored.”<\/span><\/p>\n

“Either we are lying or the government is lying. But ask yourself, \u2018What reason do the Catholic doctors have for lying?\u2019\u201d Dr. Ngare added: \u201cThe Catholic Church has been here in Kenya providing health care and vaccinating for 100 years for longer than Kenya has existed as a country.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

Dr. Ngare told LifeSiteNews<\/a><\/span> that:<\/span><\/p>\n

\n

Several things alerted doctors in the Church\u2019s far-flung medical system of 54 hospitals, 83 health centres, and 17 medical and nursing schools to the possibility the anti-tetanus campaign was secretly an anti-fertility campaign. Why, they ask does it involve an unprecedented five shots (or \u201cjabs\u201d as they are known, in Kenya) over more than two years and why is it applied only to women of child-bearing years, and why is it not being conducted without the usual fanfare of government publicity? <\/span><\/p>\n

Usually we give a series three shots over two to three years, we give it anyone who comes into the clinic with an open wound, men, women or children…. If this is intended to inoculate children in the womb, why give it to girls starting at 15 years? You cannot get married till you are 18.\u201d The usual way to vaccinate children is to wait till they are six weeks old.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

Dr. Ngare said that it is the five-vaccination regime that is most alarming:<\/span><\/p>\n

\n

We knew that the last time this vaccination with five injections has been used was in Mexico in 1993 and Nicaragua and the Philippines in 1994,\u201d s \u201cIt didn\u2019t cause miscarriages till three years later,\u201d which is why, he added, the counterclaims that women who got the vaccination recently and then got pregnant are meaningless.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

Ngare said WHO tried to bring the same anti-fertility program into Kenya in the 1990s:<\/span><\/p>\n

\n

We alerted the government and it stopped the vaccination. But this time they haven\u2019t done so.\u201dThe only time tetanus vaccine has been given in five doses is when it is used as a carrier in fertility regulating vaccines laced with the pregnancy hormone, Human Chorionic Gonadotropin (HCG) developed by WHO in 1992.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

What is Human Chorionic Gonadotropin (HCG)? According to Natural News<\/a><\/span>:<\/span><\/p>\n

\n

HCG is a chemical developed by the World Health Organization for sterilization purposes. This chemical causes a woman’s body to destroy its own fetus with vaccine-induced antibodies. When injected into the body of a young woman, it causes a pregnancy to be destroyed by the body’s own antibody response to the HCG, resulting in a spontaneous abortion. Its effectiveness lasts for years, causing abortions in women up to three years after the injections.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

It is the HCG that has been found in all six samples sent to the University of Nairobi medical laboratory and another in South Africa. The bishops and doctors warn that injecting women with HCG which mimics a natural hormone produced by pregnant women, causes them to develop antibodies against it. When they do get pregnant, and produce their own version of HCG, it triggers the production of antibodies that cause a miscarriage.<\/span><\/p>\n

Author Eric Metaxas<\/a> <\/span>called it a Sneak Contraception: Vaccines, the UN and the poor:<\/span><\/p>\n

\n

The program behind these abuses of human rights and desecration of human dignity was only one example of many such abuses that have taken place under the banner of family planning. Look up \u201ccompulsory sterilization\u201d on Wikipedia and you\u2019ll find a virtual parade of nations, ranging from obvious bad actors like China to surprising ones like Israel, which admitted to giving Ethiopian immigrants birth control injections without their knowledge or consent.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

Population Research Institute (PRI) chief Steven Mosher<\/a><\/span>, said,<\/span><\/p>\n

\n

The report is \u201cinsulting to women.\u201d The scheme to reduce fertility down to a target of 2.6 children per woman violates U.S. law. The Kenyan government, urged on by the UNFPA and USAID, is asserting the women of Kenya should not be allowed to make their own decisions regarding how many children to have, and should be re-educated into rejecting large families. <\/span><\/p>\n

Because U.S. taxpayers provide millions for the schemes, the policy violates Federal Law… Such open targets for births and contraceptive acceptors are a clear violation of the Tiahrt Amendment. Congress ought to investigate.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

Brian Clowes of Human Life International in Virginia told LifeSite News<\/a> <\/span>that WHO was not involved in the Nicaragua, Mexican and Philippines campaigns.<\/span><\/p>\n

\n

They try to maintain a spotless record. They let organizations like United Nations Population Fund and USAID do the dirty work. In the previous cases, the vaccinators insisted their product was pure until it was shown not to be. Then they claimed the positive tests for HCG were isolated, accidental contaminations in the manufacturing process. Why would the UN want to suppress the population in developing countries? \u201cRacism,\u201d Also, the developed countries want to get hold of their natural resources. And lately, there is the whole bogus global warming thing.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

Why Racism and Eugenics?<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

This is just a war against the weak <\/a><\/span>and the elites\u2019 campaign to create a master race.<\/span><\/p>\n

\n

None of this should surprise us.<\/span> <\/a>In 1939, Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger proposed a \u201cNegro Project\u201d whose goal was to greatly reduce the birth rate among southern blacks. Not for their sake, but out of a concern about, and I quote, \u201ccareless and disastrous\u201d breeding among the \u201cleast intelligent and fit.\u201d So, you\u2019ll excuse the Kenyan Bishops if they don\u2019t simply take the government\u2019s word that there\u2019s nothing to see here. There often has been.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

The idea of eugenics became popular in the nineteenth century, officially beginning in 1863. A British man named Sir Francis Galton (1882\u20131911), who was a cousin of Charles Darwin, believed the human race should be judged on the basis of inequality. And the way he would achieve this was to use \u201ceugenics.\u201d <\/span><\/p>\n

He coined the term using Greek words that expressed an original Greek concept, meaning \u201cwell,\u201d and \u201cborn.\u201d He further defined his new word as \u201cthe study of agencies under social control that may improve or impair the racial qualities of future generations whether physically or mentally.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

One of the ideas that Galton promoted was that eugenics is the theory that the human race can influence its own development through selective breeding. One of his theories was that if talented people married other talented people, the result would be even more talented offspring. These ideas were not his own, he claimed, but he was building on the ideas of other people like Thomas Malthus, Plato, and his cousin Charles Darwin.<\/span><\/p>\n

He described his ideas in an article that was published in two parts in the MacMillan\u2019s Magazine, expressing his disappointment that no one was breeding the best offspring. He was planning to improve society through marriage using mathematical methods to determine which couples would produce better offspring. Unfortunately, some ideas have grave consequences. His studies backfired, and his ideas were imported into the United States.<\/span><\/p>\n

<\/a>

Margaret Sanger (1883-1966)<\/p><\/div>\n

One of these that were influenced by Galton\u2019s scientific studies was a woman by the names of Margaret Sanger, (pictured left) who was a nurse and married the American oil tycoon Noah Slee. She was the founder of the American Birth Control League, which was renamed Planned Parenthood in 1943. Margaret Sanger was a feminist who espoused the thinking of eugenicists.<\/span><\/p>\n

She put many abortion clinics in minority neighborhoods, or what she called \u201cinferior neighborhoods.\u201dShe testified before the U.S. Senate in 1916 and called for the establishment of the Population Congress that would seek to employ what could be termed as Negative Eugenics to separate humanity.<\/span><\/p>\n

This was a study of or belief in the possibility of improving the qualities of the human species or a human population, especially by such means as discouraging reproduction by persons having genetic defects or presumed to have inheritable undesirable traits. Whereas positive eugenics is encouraging reproduction by persons presumed to have inheritable desirable traits.<\/span><\/p>\n

Her proposals of forced segregation for American citizens were the views of many eugenicists who wanted a superior and more intelligent race. Similar to the advocates of birth control, the eugenicists were seeking to assist the race toward the elimination of the unfit. These words were spoken by a woman who is admired by women\u2019s groups all over the world, including the soon to be presidential candidate Hillary Clinton!
\n<\/span><\/p>\n

She\u2019s been described as the mother of Planned Parenthood and believed in \u201cselective breeding\u201d as a solution for a better human race by preventing reproduction of the unfit. She said,<\/span><\/p>\n

We are paying for and even submitting to the dictates of an ever increasing, unceasingly spawning class of human beings who never should have been born at all.<\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Margaret Sanger had views similar to Darwin\u2019s \u201csurvival of the fittest,\u201d believing the genetic makeup of blacks, the poor, and other minorities were inferior to those of white people. She knew that some blacks would figure out her plot, so she decided to take the plan to the clergy of the black community to have them deliver the message to their congregations. In a letter to Dr. Clarence Gamble, Sanger wrote:<\/span><\/p>\n

\n

We should hire three or four colored ministers, preferably with social-service backgrounds, and with engaging personalities. The most successful educational approach to the Negro is through a religious appeal. We don\u2019t want the word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population. And the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

Notice that Sanger said the ministers should be \u201chired.\u201d Could it be that some black ministers today who support abortion still receive money from Planned Parenthood as the founder had planned? In 1970, then-Planned Parenthood boss and former American Eugenics Society vice-president Alan Guttmacher reportedly suggested that the UN should also be charged with implementing the agenda worldwide:<\/span><\/p>\n

\n

If you\u2019re going to curb population, it\u2019s extremely important not to have it done by the damned Yankees, but by the UN….. Because the thing is, then\u00a0 not considered genocide…. If you can send in a colorful UN force, you\u2019ve got much better leverage.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

That\u2019s the reason why the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) puts out an Inventory of Population Projects every year, which gives a quick view of programs and their financial support around the world. The inventory shows \u201cmultilateral\u201d support from international bodies, \u201cbilateral\u201d support from one nation to another, and support from \u201cnon-governmental organizations,\u201d or NGOs.<\/span><\/p>\n

Mark Crutcher president of Life Dynamics, a U.S. based pro-life group and producer of the hard hitting documentary Maafa 21 says,<\/span><\/p>\n

This eugenics plot was set in motion by the elites almost 150 years ago. They\u2019ve have already stated that \u201cthe best way to hate a Nigger is to hate him before he\u2019s born.\u201d This kind of eugenics by the United Nations and their population-control conspirators is not helping the black family but turning large poor families into small poor families.<\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

The documentary below exposes what Crutcher calls the ongoing genocide of blacks worldwide by prominent establishment forces. Watch the video yourself if you have the time and patience.<\/span>
\n