Is It Time to ‘Abolish the Family’ as We Know It?

Family Eating Lunch Together

I appreciate it when leftists get off script, dispatch with the propagandist talking points and say what’s really on their minds.

“Progressives” hate natural marriage.

And they hate the natural family.

But they do so love big government.

In an article for the Australian Broadcasting Corporation titled “Is having a loving family an unfair advantage?” Joe Gelonesi, host of “The Philosopher’s Zone” radio program, calls the natural mom-dad biological family a “weathered institution ever more in need of a rationale for existing.”

While he admits that it may be premature to “abolish the family and put children into care of the state,” Gelonesi suggests, nonetheless, that such government action might be the most “straightforward answer”—if only “from a purely instrumental position.”

But what’s the question? And why such hostility toward the natural family?

Buzzz! “What is social justice?” for $1,000, Alex.

In the context of marriage, family and economics, the left’s upside-down brand of social justice, of “equality,” requires that, in order to level the playing field, we must bulldoze the playing field altogether—we must take from the haves, give to the have nots and dumb-down everything else to the lowest common denominator.

If one person is suffering, then “equality” demands that all must suffer. The solution to inequality borne by those in the Third World, for instance, is to make the whole world the Third World (see Barack Hussein Obama, circa 2008-2016).

The same goes for marriage and family. As Gelonesi explains it, “The power of the family to tilt equality” creates an “unfair advantage” for children without loving biological parents. “When a parent wants to do the best for her child,” he claims, it necessarily “makes the playing field for others even more lopsided.”

And so, whereas the conservative solution is to offer a leg up, the “progressive” solution prefers a jackboot down. While equality of opportunity is a step in the right direction, equality of outcome is the statist endgame. Naturally, to reach this lofty goal, government intervention is required.

This is pure egalitarianism—cultural Marxism—and, as jaw-droppingly insane as it is, it yet remains the pervasive philosophy among “progressives” worldwide.

In order to bolster his thesis, Gelonesi interviews Adam Swift, a professor of political theory at Great Britain’s University of Warwick. Swift has co-authored, along with University of Wisconsin professor Harry Brighouse, the book, Family Values: The Ethics of Parent-Child Relationships.

Don’t let the title fool you. There’s nothing ethical about what these two men propose. “Challenging some of our most commonly held beliefs about the family,” boasts the editor’s summary, “Brighouse and Swift explain why a child’s interest in autonomy severely limits parents’ right to shape their children’s values, and why parents have no fundamental right to confer wealth or advantage on their children.” Yikes.

Gelonesi’s article describes Swift as “a philosopher with a rescue plan very much in tune with the times.” This, as you will see, says a great deal about “the times.”

“One way philosophers might think about solving the social justice problem would be by simply abolishing the family,” suggests Swift. “If the family is this source of unfairness in society, then it looks plausible to think that if we abolished the family there would be a more level playing field.” Swift concedes, however, that the family does confer some benefit to children, and, therefore, institutionalizing the little buggers may not be the best solution.

Yet.

“What we realized we needed was a way of thinking about what it was we wanted to allow parents to do for their children, and what it was that we didn’t need to allow parents to do for their children, if allowing those activities would create unfairnesses for other people’s children,” he told Gelonesi.

The operable words here are “allow,” “unfairness” and “other people’s children.”

“For Swift, there’s one particular choice that fails the test,” continues Gelonesi.

“Private schooling cannot be justified by appeal to these familial relationship goods,” he says. “It’s just not the case that in order for a family to realize these intimate, loving, authoritative, affectionate, love-based relationships you need to be able to send your child to an elite private school.”

“In contrast, reading stories at bedtime,” argues Swift, “gives rise to acceptable familial relationship goods, even though this also bestows advantage.”

Swift opines that, while banning bedtime stories outright might be an impractical step toward ensuring fairness—banning private schools is at once a plausible and necessary means to that end.

“We could prevent elite private schooling without any real hit to healthy family relationships, whereas if we say that you can’t read bedtime stories to your kids because it’s not fair that some kids get them and others don’t, then that would be too big a hit at the core of family life.”

“For Swift and Brighouse,” writes Gelonesi, “our society is curiously stuck in a time warp of proprietorial rights: If you biologically produce a child, you own it.”

“‘We think that although in practice it makes sense to parent your biological offspring, that is not the same as saying that in virtue of having produced the child the biological parent has the right to parent.'”

By now, you should be saying “holy smokes” or some such. This is unadulterated fascism on parade. And it’s winning the Western world over. Speaking of parades, Swift goes on to wade the unpotable waters that will inevitably fester in the wake of the global “gay marriage” tsunami.

“Nothing in our theory assumes two parents: There might be two, there might be three, and there might be four,” he observes.

“Politicians love to talk about family values, but meanwhile the family is in flux, and so we wanted to go back to philosophical basics to work out what are families for and what’s so great about them and then we can start to figure out whether it matters whether you have two parents or three or one, or whether they’re heterosexual, etc.”

But lest we deem the good professor entirely bat-guano-crazy, he sets an arbitrary cap on parents permitted, to allay our concerns. “We do want to defend the family against complete fragmentation and dissolution,” he graciously allows. “If you start to think about a child having 10 parents, then that’s looking like a committee rearing a child; there aren’t any parents there at all.”

Such is the irrational mindset of the self-styled rationalist—the immoral nattering of the moral relativist.

According to Swift and millions of very dangerous people just like him, the biblical admonition to “honor thy father and mother” is totally passé. Children today must “honor thy father and father, mother and mother, fathers and fathers or mothers and mothers.”

Better still to just “honor thy progressive government.”

MattBarberAvatar-1Matt Barber is founder and editor-in chief of BarbWire.com. He is an author, columnist, cultural analyst and an attorney concentrating in constitutional law.Having retired as an undefeated heavyweight professional boxer, Matt has taken his fight from the ring to the culture war. (Follow Matt on Twitter: @jmattbarber).

Afterword comments from the Editor

One of the toughest jobs on this planet but also the most rewarding is parenting. In one of the interviews conducted by a CBN reporter, the Duggars who have 19 children, were asked, “Why have so many children?” Here was response from the mother:

We had our first child, Josh, four years in marriage and then I went back on the pill. Then I ended up getting pregnant while on the pill and I lost that baby. I had a miscarriage. At that point we really began to evaluate what we were thinking. With our own hands, we with own lack of knowledge had destroyed our own baby. And that was devastating. We got on our knees and cried out to God and said, “Father, forgive us and give us a love for children like You love children.” When He says that children are a gift and a blessing and a reward, we have seen that lived out for the last twenty-three years. It’s been a lot of hard work, but much, much joy….

Jim Bob Duggar also weighed in:

We’ve had many emails from people…. There are people who don’t like us because of the size of the family that we have. But we’ve had many emails from people—this one lady the other day said, “I was getting ready to have an abortion and turned on the TV and I saw your show and I thought, ‘If these people can do it with seventeen children, then I can do it with one.’ And I decided not to have an abortion.

Now we understand why stones are being thrown at Josh and the whole family. Seeward was right...They’ve been looking for an opportunity to blackmail the family that reminds all of us that we’ve sinned against God. By destroying and discrediting the Duggar family, they are attacking the family, faith and decency-that’s the end-game.

In his book, Storm Warning Don McAlvany indeed warns us:

The destruction of the family bond has always been an important step toward achieving totalitarian rule. The feminists and other global activists are slowly but steadily destroying individuals and families because they want to control our children and transform their minds as a major element in their quest for a one-world government dictatorship controlled by the communist state.

Christians are the only people standing in the way of these globalists, so they must attack the family, neutralize parental rights, and take control of the children through all these socialized systems. They know that many Christian parents cannot be re-educated for this new occultist anti-Christ dispensation.

So the tactic is to break the bond and eliminate the influence of the parents on the children. How do they intend to achieve this? They will do this “by instilling in children secular humanist, anti-religious thinking; weakening them through promiscuous sexual behavior; and programming them to be obedient, passive, citizens or serfs in the emerging new global village.

The theory of collective parenting is nothing new. Many social workers share the same view of severing parental rights and demolishing parental authority in certain cases. Children don’t belong to whole communities and they are not property of the state. The concept of “collective ownership” of children comes from communism, not from the Bible.

Christian parents who believe and teach their children biblical principles don’t believe that children belong to whole communities, but rather to individual families.

But the elites of our day share the same philosophy of the French Revolutionists— that children belong to the state before belonging to private families. Louise-Antoine de Saint reportedly agreed that “children be seized from families and raised entirely by the state after the age of five.”

The Lord has entrusted our children to our care—not just their bodies, but also their souls. Parents should be the children’s primary educators, protectors, and guides who train and raise them up to live a godly life in this present age. The function of the state is to support the family in this divinely ordained assignment. (See Romans 13)

Theologian Johannes Messner is quoted to have written,

The family is the prior to state. It holds natural rights which the state is bound to recognize….The prominent task of the state is to make it possible for families to fulfill their natural function.

Having children is a proof that all people are created in the image of God and they have worth. But this pride-filled age of reason and philosophy is always trying to look for psychological and technological explanation for everything—including raising the children.

We are now using medical technology and knocking at the door of families and churches saying, we have to take over now, who lives and who will die. We’ve almost decided to kill everyone that inconveniences us. Now so these called philosophers think they know better than God Who holds their breath as this lady in the next video reminds us:

[youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hOWMmx6eBjU]

Image Courtesy of The Gospel Coalition




Let Him who is Without sin be the First to Throw a stone at Josh Duggar….

1416601579_19-kids-counting-zoom-1The Bible tells us a story of a woman caught in act of adultery by the religious scholars and Pharisees. They stood her in plain sight of everyone and said,

Teacher, this woman was caught red-handed in the act of adultery. Moses, in the Law, gives orders to stone such persons. What do you say?” They were trying to trap him into saying something incriminating so they could bring charges against him.

Jesus bent down and wrote with his finger in the dirt. They kept at him, badgering him. He straightened up and said,

“The sinless one among you, go first: Throw the stone.” Bending down again, he wrote some more in the dirt. Hearing that, they walked away, one after another, beginning with the oldest.

The woman was left alone. Jesus stood up and spoke to her. “Woman, where are they? Does no one condemn you?” “No one, Master.” “Neither do I, condemn you” go, and sin no more. (John 8:1-11)

Jesus loved and forgave this woman. He loved her so much that He about to die on the cross for her sins and for ours. But He still called her actions sin. He didn’t say “Go and follow your desires or whatever you want. Sin is a choice and has consequences, whereas mistakes are human errors. Sin has to be repented of, confessed, and completely forsaken.

That’s why Jesus told the woman “Go and sin no more. Jesus does not compromise His standards of morality. He forgives our sin because all of us, both single and married, young and old, are prone to the desires, appetites, passions, and temptations of the flesh. The good news is that Jesus died on the cross for all our sins. If Josh Duggar has repented, confessed and completely forsaken his sins, then he’s forgiven just like every one of us.

Here is an excerpt from Dr Michael Brown’s opinion:

……Sadly professing Christians have written to me, assuring me that God could never forgive Josh for what he did or that, “once a molester, always a molester.” And they also assure me that they understand grace and believe in the power of the gospel.

Nonsense.

Responses like theirs make me wonder if they have ever experienced God’s mercy themselves. The fact is, the very best of us are worthless wretches outside of His grace, and on the holiest day of our lives, in ourselves, we are utterly depraved in light of God’s perfect brightness.

If you have ever come under deep conviction of sin, either as a sinner or a saint (meaning, as a non-believer or as a believer), you know what I’m talking about. Suddenly, your flesh is revealed, as happened to the prophet Isaiah when he encountered the Lord in Isaiah 6, crying out:

Woe is me! For I am lost; for I am a man of unclean lips, and I dwell in the midst of a people of unclean lips; for my eyes have seen the King, the LORD of hosts! (Isaiah 6:5)

Suddenly, you become aware of the depth of your guilt and depravity, of the impurity of your motives, of the corruption of your actions, of your selfishness or greed or envy or lust or hatred or pride or rebellion or bitterness – or all of the above.

You feel as if the worst hell is too good for you, and you are completely overwhelmed when you realize that not only is God willing to forgive you, but that Jesus died for you and paid for every one of those sins, pronouncing you righteous through faith and bringing you into His family as a fellow child of the Father.

In the words of John Newton, the former slave trader, guilty of committing atrocities against fellow human beings: “Amazing grace, how sweet the sound, that saved a wretch like me.”

I know extraordinary men of God today who used to be in involved in terrorist activities or who were once sexually depraved or consumed by hate, and they are some of the saintliest people on the planet. And all of us, no matter how we lived our lives, were sinners in need of salvation and mercy.

Those who have been shown mercy should lead the way in showing mercy. Those who have been forgiven should lead the way in forgiving others; those who have been transformed should be the first to believe for the transformation of others.

We should exercise wisdom when it comes to putting certain people in certain positions (for example, no matter how transformed a convicted, former child molester might be, I would never put that person in the church’s children’s ministry, for many obvious reasons).

But we should absolutely believe in the power of God to forgive the worst of sinners and trust the power of the blood of Jesus to make us truly clean.

I really do fear for those who do not recognize the depth of their own sin in light of God’s holiness and who do not understand the principle that “judgment is without mercy to one who has shown no mercy. Mercy triumphs over judgment” (Jacob [James] 2:13).

May we be ambassadors of the transforming mercy of God, and may we glory in the life-transforming power of the gospel.

That’s what the cross is all about.

So are why all these self-righteous people condemning the man? It’s because of the victims. It wasn’t their fault and they felt violated and a seed of unrighteousness was planted in their souls without their consent.

I read a true story sometime ago of someone who had a wounded spirit, whom I will call Sarah, saying, “I can’t bear to hear anything about sexual immorality, I feel so dirty already, and this makes me feel worse.” This lady reportedly related her horror story of repeated sexual intercourse with her father from the time she was nine and of a date rape she suffered in her teens. She became promiscuous after that and felt sexual purity was forever out of her reach. She felt an overwhelming sense of hopelessness.

Author Stormie Omartian, who related this story, said,

What Sarah did not know was that sexual purity, like virginity, is something only you can give away…. It is not something that can be taken from you. Why? Because sexual purity is a matter of the heart. Someone may forcibly penetrate your body, but they can’t penetrate your heart, soul, and spirit.

Joyce Meyer, a well-known Christian author and evangelist, was sexually abused by her father from the time she was a young child until she became of age. I heard her sharing her testimony on GOD TV that her father had abused her almost 200 times. Yet in spite of all this trauma she went through, God has still used her to offer a remedy to those who are hurting and those who find themselves in similar situations today.

So the Lord will still use these ladies that were abused when young if at all they remember that forgiveness doesn’t make the other person right; it makes you free to get healing and freedom beyond what you thought possible.

In another lengthy blog post, Grace Greater Than Our Sin, Michael Seewald, father-in-law to Jessa Duggar Seewald (Josh’s sister), exposed a big part of Josh Duggar’s situation the “ministry of truth” mainstream media has forgotten. I felt compelled to post part of the article here because he offers a far better view on this controversial matter:

There is blood in the water and the sharks are in a feeding frenzy. Finally, the Duggar family’s opponents have found what they have been eagerly waiting for: shocking revelations of scandal by Jim Bob and Michelle’s firstborn son….Josh fondled several underage girls twelve years ago when he was a young teenager……

While Josh Duggar had owned up to his sins years ago with the people that it concerned, he has now publicly acknowledged them with grief and regret, and resigned his position as Executive Director of Family Research Council Action.

……It pains me to see that they are now having to relive the nightmare that had been laid to rest well over a decade ago with Josh’s repentance and reformation, but I feel compelled to bring some context and reason to the bloodletting that many are engaging in and to come to the aid of our dear friends and family.

…….I believe that Josh’s parents acted in a way that godly parents should. They did not turn a blind eye, but earnestly sought help from the church, counselors, and eventually the police. Maybe they didn’t do it in a way that pleases everyone, but they acted decisively to confront the sin, to call a penitent son back from his errors, and to seek to aid the hurting victims. In the end Josh sought forgiveness from those he wronged, repented of his sins, and came to trust Christ as his Savior……

……The victims of Josh’s actions should not be lost in all of this. Sadly, this type of thing is all too common. Victims of sexual abuse of any kind often suffer greatly for many years as a result of these sins. We should not downplay the seriousness of these offenses particularly, nor gloss over the pain and confusion they often bring, sometimes for a lifetime.

Some people act as if it was the Duggar’s responsibility to have made this sad episode in their family public knowledge. They are to be praised for not hiding this from the appropriate parties and eventually the police, but they owed it to no one else to publicize the sins of a minor child and the court agrees with that assessment, the judge now ordering that the police report be destroyed.

But the cat is already out of the bag. How many of you would broadcast the sins of your children to the whole world? Would you be willing to publicize your own darkest moments?……..

There are many who seem shocked that a child from a Christian family would do such things. While it is always alarming when we find out about our children’s sins, we should not be surprised. Christians (and many other reasonable people) believe that we are all born with a sinful nature.

David, king of Israel spoke of his inborn sin like this when he was repenting of his adultery and murder by proxy: “Behold, I was sharpen in iniquity; and in sin did my mother conceive me.” Psalm 51:5.

The prophet Isaiah concurs. “But we are all as an unclean thing, and all our righteousnesses are as filthy rags; and we all do fade as a leaf; and our iniquities, like the wind, have taken us away.” Isaiah 64:6. While not all of our sins find a way to manifest themselves externally we all know the corruption that is present in each of our hearts.

It is a mercy of God that he restrains the evil of mankind otherwise we would have destroyed ourselves long ago. Many times it is simply lack of opportunity or fear of consequences that keep us from falling into grievous sin even though our fallen hearts would love to indulge the flesh.

We should not be shocked that this occurred in the Duggar’s home, we should rather be thankful to God if we have been spared such, and pray that he would keep us and our children from falling.

There are others that see this episode as a result of sheltering and repressing human desires. They think that had he access to sex education by Planned Parenthood, been allowed to watch edgy Hollywood films, been encouraged to experimentation with a girlfriend, or gotten free condoms from the local school nurse, then none of this would have happened. Right.

The stupidity of some people is mind boggling. Fan the flames of youthful lust and you end up with what we have: unprecedented numbers of unwed mothers, millions of abortions, rampant STDs, and the unraveling of the fabric of our whole society. Josh didn’t sin because he was repressed, he sinned because like all of us he is a sinner.

Are Jim Bob and Michelle to be scolded for raising their children with high moral standards and this moral failing evidence that they are legalistic hypocrites? No. Although individual Christian family’s interpretation of God’s moral standards may vary somewhat in practical ways they are right in holding high moral standards.

It is always our duty to live a godly life, and even when we fail, God’s moral standards found in the Bible don’t change. It is by our inability to live up to them that we understand our need of a Savior. Are the Duggars perfect in their interpretation of God’s moral standards? No. But neither is anyone else.

They may be stricter than some which comes with certain difficulties but there are also many difficulties on the other end of the spectrum in being lenient. Is it helpful to tweak our parenting practices if the results are less than desirable.

Yes, we should constantly be learning and growing as parents and change when we see a better way, yet no parenting method is without flaw. The heart of the matter is do you have a good relationship with your children? From my perspective, this is where Jim Bob and Michelle excel.

So, what is the ultimate answer? The answer is what Josh found and millions like him. He found forgiveness and cleansing from Jesus Christ. There are many of you that are reading these words right now having had thoughts and deeds no better than what Josh had and did. You are a sinner. You are a sinner by birth and choice.

It is because of that corruption that is common to all that you have violated God’s holy commandments. If you continue in your present course Jesus Christ himself will judge you unworthy of eternal life. But he has graciously provided the only way of salvation and that is by trusting in him and his atoning death on the cross as the payment that God requires to absolve you of the guilt of your sins.

Listen to the words of the apostle Paul about the forgiveness found in Christ. “In whom we have redemption through his blood, the forgiveness of sins, according to the riches of his grace;” Ephesians 1:7. Christ spilled his blood to redeem us from the bondage of sin and death. This was accomplished by his taking our sins upon himself and being punished in our place.

Here is a warning for everyone reading this, by condemning a repentant sinner you have placed yourself in the place of God. Jesus said, “For with what judgment ye judge, ye shall be judged: and with what measure ye mete, it shall be measured to you again.” Matthew 7:2. We are never to condone sin, and the sins of Josh’s youth are reprehensible.

Civil penalties are sometimes required and we should never begrudge the victims of crimes or the civil authorities from seeking justice, but we are not to condemn repentant sinners in our hearts or with our tongues or pens. Though consequences are sometimes necessary and desired to uphold civil society and to bring temporary justice, Jesus forgives repentant sinners, real sinners: murderers, thieves, child molesters, homosexuals, self righteous church goers, the proud, liars, scoffers, atheists, hypocrites, and any other sinner or combination of them all.

All that is required is to come to Jesus confessing that you are a sinner and with faith that his death will avail for you. He will receive you and begin the process of salvaging your life for his glory. Believe these beautiful words of the Lord Jesus. “All that the Father giveth me shall come to me; and him that cometh to me I will in no wise cast out. For I came down from heaven, not to do mine own will, but the will of him that sent me.

And this is the Father’s will which hath sent me, that of all which he hath given me I should lose nothing, but should raise it up again at the last day. And this is the will of him that sent me, that every one which seeth the Son, and believeth on him, may have everlasting life: and I will raise him up at the last day.” John 6:37-40. Look upon Jesus with eyes of faith and you too will be redeemed. Remember, Jesus said, “I came not to call the righteous, but sinners to repentance.” Luke 5:32……

Finally, a word to the millions of muted victims of sexual abuse all over the world. It is not your fault. No matter what the abuser may have said, you are not the one to blame. Do not keep silent if you are being abused, tell someone you trust, a parent, a teacher, a friend, anyone is better than silence. You are likely not the only one who has been abused.

Tell someone so that they will be stopped. If the person you tell doesn’t contact the right people to help, tell someone else. Stay away from the abuser if at all possible, or avoid being alone with them. If the abuser is in your family, you may feel conflicted. You may love this person and can’t understand why they are hurting you.

No matter how much you love the abuser you must tell someone. Remember, it is never okay for someone to treat you that way even if they are a parent, a sibling, or a friend. There are many people who will help you if you just break the silence…..

For those who bear the emotional scars of abuse I empathize with you. Healing is possible and many people have found it. Turn to Jesus Christ and find your identity in him. Lean upon him as he cleanses away the guilt and pain…….

Credit Image: Courtesy of Micheal Seewald