Four Months of Critical Information is Missing from Alfie Evans’ Timeline

Baby Alfie Evans’ life recently came to an end when the Alder Hey Trust pushed to suffocate and starve him two weeks before his second birthday. Alfie’s tragic death raises more questions than answers – specifically why was hospital leadership’s so intent on ending Alfie’s life?

The publicly available court document appears to skip approximately four months of critical information, from May 2016 to September 2016. [1] You will see there was an indication Alfie was not right as early as July of 2016. [1]

Only Tom and Kate (Alfie’s parents) or medical records can fill this time period of critical events.

Alfie Evans’ Missing Pediatric Visits

My assumption is Tom and Kate brought Alfie to see a pediatrician for “well-baby checkups”. In the United States, that term is a euphemism for getting your child injected with toxic vaccines. As you can imagine, I noticed pediatric visits and evaluations strangely absent from the documentation.

Timing here is important. Why?

Personal experience has taught me doctors rarely attribute sudden health anomalies with vaccines. They normally classify neurological regression or illness following an injection as a simple coincidence. This fact is important – it could be one justification for not including the information into the court record.

Being a father of a vaccine-injured child has taught me to look a bit deeper.

Let’s first have a look at the metadata in Alfie’s documented timeline. We can then see why the timing of events during this four month period is significant.

Alfie Evans’ Timeline and Reported Sequence of Events (MAY 2016 – DEC 2016)

1. May 9th – The timeline outlined in the court case for Alfie Evans started with his healthy birth at Liverpool Women’s Hospital on May 9th, 2016. It was reported that, “Alfie was a happy smiling baby who seemed to be perfectly well.” [1]
2. June – No data.
3. July [mid?] – The court document describes Alfie developed a “divergent squint” in July.[1]
4. August – No data.
5. September [mid?] – Alfie was seen by his general practitioner for his first developmental check. His mother was concerned about his smiles becoming less frequent and sleeping. [1]
6. November 11^th – He was reviewed at the outpatient clinic in Alder Hey Hospital. On examination he was there found to be functioning in a range appropriate to a six week – 2 month old infant. An MRI brain/spine scan was arranged for 30 November 2016. [1]
7. November 30^th – A consulting pediatrician noted “The MRI brain scan done [on November 30^th] showed evidence of borderline delayed myelination for his chronological age and unexplained diffusion restriction along sensory motor cortex, the cortical-spinal tracts and fibres leading into the medial temporal lobes.” [1]
8. December 14^th – Alfie was admitted to Alder Hey Accident and Emergency Department. His parents reported seizure-like activity. A microbiology test on a nasopharyngeal aspirate (NPA) showed rhinovirus/enterovirus. Alfie was diagnosed with acute viral bronchiolitis and a possible prolonged febrile convulsion. [1]
9. December 15^th – Dr. “R” reported sudden unprovoked movements compatible with infantile/epileptic spasms. Midazolam which is a benzodiazepine was administered to Alfie. [1]
10. December 16^th – An EEG performed on the 16th December 2016 confirmed hypsarrhythmia (electrical correlate to clinical epileptic or infantile spasms, disorganised EEG). Alfie was commenced on a different anti-convulsant, Vigabatrin. [1]
11. December 19^th – Dr. “R” recommended a plan to transfer Alfie to the High Dependency Unit for non-invasive respiratory support. However, due to a rapid decline in his condition, Alfie was transferred to the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU). This was due to Alfie suffering from pneumonia. [1]

Vaccine Schedule Overlay on Alfie’s Timeline

Next I decided to overlay the United Kingdom’s vaccine schedule over Alfie’s timeline. I made several reasonable assumptions you need to be aware of. As I mentioned earlier, Alfie’s parents or medical records would confirm the following:

• Assumption #1: Alfie visited a pediatrician or general practitioner.
• Assumption #2: Alfie was vaccinated. UK vaccine compliance is around +90%. [2]
• Assumption #3: Alfie was vaccinated on time in accordance to the UK schedule. [3]
• Assumption #4: Alfie received all vaccines during his pediatric visits.

What follows is an overlay of the two sets of data.

If Alfie followed the United Kingdom vaccine schedule, he would have received 9 vaccine doses prior to his first developmental check in September 2016.  The doctors would have also observed and recorded these facts somewhere in Alfie’s medical records.

Please note this is the appointment where Alfie’s mother reported he was smiling less frequently and that, “…he [Alfie] was sleeping to an extent that had begun to alarm her…”

Sleeping and lethargy are common indicators of encephalitis, a medical term used to describe brain swelling (also listed on vaccine inserts as a side effect).

The Concerning “Divergent Squint”

As we work through Alfie’s timeline, recall it was reported that Alfie had acquired a “divergent squint” sometime in July [see below]. [1] This condition can go by different terms such as exotropia, strabismus, or oculomotor nerve palsy and can be caused by viral infections (which Alfie had). [1, 4]

It’s well known in the medical literature that,

“Enteroviral encephalitis presents with wide range of symptoms…fever, headache, lethargy, drowsiness, altered sensorium, coma, … myoclonic jerks, oculomotor problems (nystagmus, strabismus, or gaze paresis), and bulbar palsy (dysphagia, dysarthria, dysphonia, and facial weakness).” [5]

As a matter of fact, some of these symptoms – including oculomotor palsies – have been observed with infantile paralysis (also known as “polio”, which is an enterovirus) since 1884. [6]

Another piece of the puzzle falls into on December 14^th where a Nasopharyngeal Aspirate (NP) test showed Alfie was infected with a, “…rhinovirus/ enterovirus.” [1]

A day later on December 15^th, Dr. “R” reported,

“[Alfie] remained profoundly encephalopathic/comatose and remained unresponsive to central noxious stimuli (i.e. painful/ uncomfortable stimulation delivered via rubbing of cranial nerve exit points in the area of his eyebrows). [1]

To summarize what we know from this short analysis, we find that,

1. Alfie had an obvious oculomotor palsy in his left eye;
2. Alfie was infected with a rhinovirus/ enterovirus, and that;
3. Alfie’s brain was swollen (with seizures)

Your Arrogance Blinds You

Here is the million dollar question: What virus type was Alfie infected with?

I regard this as a critical question to be answered. I also would expect responsible experts in their trade would have explored all possible angles, wouldn’t they? After all, Judge Anthony Hayden arrogantly wrote about Alder Hey Children’s Hospital that it is,

“… a recognised centre of excellence in tertiary neurology and neurosurgery. It is a well-equipped, new and extremely impressive hospital. It specialises in investigating and treating children with the most complex neurological disorders. The range of investigation that I have set out above has also to be considered in the context of the available facilities at this particular hospital, which can properly be said to hold world-class facilities.” [1]

A world-class facility would have world-class methods to isolate and identify Alfie’s virus.

The Liverpool Brain Infections Group, funded by pharmaceutical companies like Novartis and Sanofi-Pasteur, would have likely looked at Alfie’s scans. [7]

Yet, Judge Hayden writes,

“It is recognised that all the doctors have come to the conclusion that Alfie is suffering from a neurodegenerative disorder. Nobody knows what triggered or caused this devastating erosion of Alfie’s brain…” [1]

I don’t believe his response or the analysis performed by the doctors for one minute.

Conclusion

As I stated in the introduction, Alfie’s situation has raised more questions than answers. What do the records at Alder Hey show? What do the records at Alder Hey really show?

Was Alfie infected with a vaccine-derived virus? July is same month where Alfie would have received his first round of vaccinations. July is temporally significant.

Which came first, the “divergent squint” or the vaccine?

My bet is Alfie received the vaccine first.

The circumstances in which little Alfie’s life ended can be used to help parents get a glimpse into those adamant on protecting a corrupt system.

Godspeed Tom, Kate, and Alfie…

UPDATE:

• After publication we were notified of two pieces of information. The first piece is a photo of Alfie’s vaccine records were made available here.

 

 

• A screenshot of Kate’s Facebook feed shows a General Practitioner visit on September 9th, 2016.

References:

1. https://www.judiciary.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/alder-hey-v-evans.pdf
2. https://files.digital.nhs.uk/pdf/d/3/nhs-immu-stat-eng-2016-17-rep.pdf
3. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk…
4. https://www.merckmanuals.com/professional…
5. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4153822/
6. http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/003591571100401446
7. https://www.liverpool.ac.uk/infection-and-global-health/research/brain-infections-group/

Copyright © 2018 Jeffry John Aufderheide Vac Truth.com-All rights reserved

 

Your baby is a target. She may be a twinkle in your eye, or floating comfortably within your womb, or she may be 40 years old with children of her own. To the massive and deeply corrupt pharmaceutical industry, she, and every other man, woman, and child on the planet, are seen as merely an endless source of revenue.

According to industry magazine “Pharmaceutical Commerce” the projected global growth rate for the pharmaceutical  industry is 6.3% through 2022, up from the 5% for the 2014-2020 period. Total revenue for the industry is expected to reach $1.12 TRILLION dollars by 2022. Nearly half (45%) of that according to “GEN, Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology News” will be from vaccines. So, don’t believe it when the claim is made that vaccines are not a big money maker.

The world vaccines market is predicted to increase at an even higher compound annual rate than the rest of the industry; reaching a rate of 7.6% during 2013–2022. Revenue from vaccines is expected to “reach $45.1 billion in 2022 as new product introductions continue and usage of current products expands further.”

In May of 2017, Resolution 327 was offered in Congress “Recognizing the importance of vaccinations and immunizations in the United States.” It is curious that the authors and 35 co-sponsors felt a need to recognize both “vaccinations and immunizations”. Typically, in legislation and articles on the subject, these words are synonyms for the magic shots that will render the recipient ‘immune’ from the intended disease.

One would not, for example, expect to see a resolution recognizing the cuteness of both baby dogs and puppies. Perhaps the authors of 327 secretly understand that vaccines do not actually confer immunization, that vaccines and immunity are two very distinct, different things.

Vaccines are injected pharmaceutical products promoted for use from before the cradle to days before the grave and sold under the pretense of providing some semblance of pathogenic immunity. (As a lover of words, I think it is important to remember that the root word of ‘vaccines’ is ‘vacca’. No, not ‘vacay’, as in ‘vacation’. ‘Vacca’, as in Latin for ‘cow’. Why is this? Because the first smallpox vaccine was pus which oozed out of the udders of cowpox infected cows and was then smeared into an incision on the victim’s , oops,  patient’s arm.)

Immunization, however, is a body’s recognition of and effective defense against a given disease. Immunization occurs within a healthy immune system (notice the etymological connection there?) and a strong immune system is never created by injecting foreign, complex manufactured chemical compounds into one’s muscle mass but by good nutrition, adequate rest, and plenty of clean water.  Unless quoting a law that uses the terminology, I therefore avoid using the overused misnomer; ‘immunization’ in reference to shots of any kind.

As a citizen of these United States, a resident of the great state of Colorado, a father, and a passionate participant in this thing called Democracy I felt it was my duty and responsibility to reach out my Congresswoman, Diana DeGette, in an attempt to communicate my concerns about this resolution. This particular Representative of the Denver metro area is so enamored with all things pharmaceutical that I literally thought her last campaign brochure was an ad for the pharmaceutical industry.

Even though the industry is one of the most profitable industries in the world, she felt compelled to give them massive taxpayer funded subsidies with her so-called “Healthy People 2020” initiative. I explained to her that the proposed resolution is nothing more than a pledge of fealty to the pharmaceutical industry.

The industry already has more lobbyists than any other industry. More than aerospace. More than guns. More than agriculture. According to Open Secrets, in 2016 the pharmaceutical industry channeled more than $20 million to lawmakers. To make matters worse, the industry also has a strangle hold on America’s media.

The industry’s own sources reported that advertisements inundating news broadcasts and daytime TV have increased 62% since 2012. Imagine how much media control pharmaceutical companies purchased with the $6 billion they spent on advertising last year. Do you really think that with that much revenue coming from the industry that the nightly news would air an unbiased reports on vaccines?

Vaccine manufacturers clearly do not need our elected Representatives’ subservient acquiescence. The citizens of this country however, do need our lawmakers to have a modicum of integrity and not be whores fulfilling the every desire of the vaccine industry.

In the United States of America each individual state presently has autonomy regarding their vaccine laws. California, for example, with the passage of SB 277 in 2015, effectively eliminated all parental vaccine choice. Medical exemptions are technically still available under California’s law but doctors providing them are being systematically persecuted.

Every child, every shot. No exemptions. No exceptions.

States such as Colorado, on the other hand, are preserving medical freedom by pushing back against Pharma backed legislation and persistently working hard to protect the rights of citizens over the profits of corporations. The Colorado legislature, recognizing the inherent values of freedom and personal sovereignty, has steadfastly protected the rights of parents to choose what does and does not get injected into their children’s bodies.

Congressional Resolution 327 is particularly troubling in light of what other multi-national corporate interests have achieved in the ravaging of our country’s legislative integrity. When the tiny state of Vermont had the audacity to pass a consumer protective, mandatory GMO labeling law, Monsanto swooped in and immediately pushed through a much weaker, voluntary national GMO (non)labeling law. The national law effectively nullified the efforts and intentions of the people of Vermont.

Citizens in every state are now effectively organized to protect medical freedom and it will not be surprising to see legislators at the federal level coming to the aid of their corporate sponsors to force compulsory vaccinations upon all Americans.

As seen in California’s draconian SB 277, it is the desire of the pharmaceutical industry and their legislative cronies to have unlimited enforcement authority over an unlimited number of vaccinations. This should be of grave concern to all of us regardless of religious beliefs or political affiliations. Every citizen of these United States, and every citizen of the world for that matter, has (or should have) the right to informed consent.

We hold the imperative to be deeply informed about the ingredients, effects, and functionality of vaccines so that we can wisely decide upon their use or their avoidance.  It is critical for responsible citizens to be cognizant of the control the pharmaceutical industry has upon the official narrative about disease and health. Hint: the official story corresponds to reality about as much as your grade school history lessons about Christopher Columbus do.

The official story and those who repeat it would have us believe that without our unwavering devotion to vaccines, western civilization would inevitably slide into a dark abyss of rampant disease and apocalyptic morbidity. The truth, however difficult it may be to come to terms with, is that vaccines such as those for polio and smallpox have, in fact, been introduced to the public at the end of the intended disease’s natural cycle and actually contributed not to those diseases demise but to their continuation.

Other vaccines such as the HepB shot AT BIRTH are, when considered with any semblance of logic or any remaining shred of ‘mother’s intuition’, ridiculously and dangerously unnecessary. The medical establishment has even conceded that the HepB shot is given at day one because well, what if that baby never comes to a doctor again? HepB is most often contracted by sharing dirty intravenous drug needles and by unprotected, promiscuous sex.

It can be transferred from a hepB positive mother to her infant but if you don’t have the disease your baby won’t either. So why this shot? Why on day one? Here’s the harsh reality: to train you. If they can convince you to give your new born child a shot that is so obviously unnecessary, they got you. You’ll do anything they say. Your submission is absolute. You are now the perfect, unquestioning consumer. Quite literally from cradle to grave.

Understand that the goal of the pharmaceutical industry is to create customers and from those customers squeeze out as much profit as possible. Period. As corporations, their responsibility is it to their shareholders. They have a well documented history of selling many products in their other lines that knowingly caused severe injury and death of tens of thousands. They do not care.

Why or how could one assume that their vaccine divisions would be any different? Do you really think they produce these products out of some altruistic motive? Would the push for mandatory vaccinations exist if there was not such a massive profit motive? In 1986, faced with mounting lawsuits for vaccine induced injuries, the vaccine industry successfully blackmailed Congress to provide them with complete indemnity.

Rather than committing to make safer, more effective vaccines the industry threatened to cease all production of vaccines unless they were granted immunity from all prosecution. This, ironically, is the only true immunity ever offered by vaccines.

Parents, hold your baby close, no matter what his or her age. Marvel at her perfection. As you gaze at your child, ask yourself, are willing for your child to be used for target practice?

Copyright 2017, VacTruth.com– All rights reserved

Children around the world are being taught in school from an early age to believe that vaccines are safe and effective as part of their education. Not only is there evidence to support this fact, but there is also evidence that many children are being regularly brainwashed to believe that if they do not receive their vaccinations, they could get ill and die from vaccine-preventable diseases.

The Learning Network, which works in conjunction with The New York Times, lays out a series of lesson plans for teachers in the US, including a lesson titled Fighting Disease: Researching the History and Biology of Vaccines. This lesson in particular should interest the many parents who are unaware that their children are being brainwashed to think in a particular way when they send them to school. [1]

Overall, there are a total of six different quizzes covering various topics, including the following: the immune system, vaccines today, vaccine safety and vaccines in history.

In quiz number one, the students were asked to evaluate the following six statements to determine whether or not they believe them to be true or false:

1. Vaccines often cause serious illness and death.
2.  Vaccine-preventable diseases like measles and chicken pox cause only mild illness, so there is no real benefit to vaccination.
3.  Vaccinating a large group of people helps keep those who haven’t yet been vaccinated, like young infants, healthy.
4. It’s better to catch a disease like the measles than to receive a vaccine for it.
5. Vaccine-preventable diseases are now so rare, there’s no longer a need to vaccinate against them.
6. Research has shown a clear and consistent link between vaccines and autism.

The quiz was presented to the students electronically, and after they had provided a true or false answer, they were given a score with the correct answer along with an explanation. The answers to the above questions were as follows:

1. False. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, serious side effects or complications from vaccines are exceedingly rare; most vaccines cause only mild side effects like soreness at the injection site.
2. False. Diseases like measles and chicken pox not only cause discomfort during the illness, but also can have complications like pneumonia or other bacterial infections.
3. True. Vaccinating large numbers of people against diseases keeps the number of infections in a community low, reducing the risk of infection for others, like young babies who are not yet old enough to receive certain vaccines. This concept is called community immunity.
4. False. Catching a vaccine-preventable disease not only makes you likely to spread it throughout the community, but there is also the risk of developing rare and serious complications.
5. False. While many vaccine-preventable diseases are rare in the United States, travelers to other countries may be exposed and bring the disease home. There have also been outbreaks of diseases like measles and whooping cough in the United States in recent years. Public health authorities say one possible reason is a growing number of people refusing to receive vaccines.
6. False. In fact, the medical study that purported to link vaccines to autism was retracted after its author, whose medical license was revoked, was found to have altered patient data. More information is available from the Institute for Vaccine Safety. 

Each statement is ambiguous in content; in other words, it is open to more than one interpretation. However, if you continue to read through the different lessons provided, it soon becomes clear that our children are being indoctrinated and prevented from being able to think for themselves. This mind-controlling technique is called neuro-linguistic programming (NLP) and it is often used in an educational setting to influence the way children think.

Mr. Brian Gerrish has been discussing the subject of NLP for many years. In his article titled From Magic to Madness – The Government’s NLP Assault on Our Minds, he stated that:

“NLP is a method of influencing brain behaviour … If our brain behaviour can be influenced, who will do the influencing, to what effect and for what reason? If we accept that overt training organisations such as NLPLife only have the best interests of the public at heart, is that true of all organisations?”  [2]

Gerrish believes that governments are using NLP to influence the way that we think and learn to benefit their agenda and he could be correct, because when it comes to vaccinations, governments are inventing more and more ingenious ways to promote vaccination safety.

Comic Strips are Recommended to Teach Science in School

In 2014, cartoonist Maki Naro produced an online comic strip titled Vaccines Work. Here are the Facts. Hailed a success, Naro’s comic strip has been backed by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, and according to several websites, Naro has “done a champion job” at smashing the anti-vaccine misinformation to pieces. [3-5]

In fact, according to scientists from Oxford University, comics such as this one have found their way onto the shelves of school libraries and classrooms. This is because there has been a growing interest in studying the uses and applications of comics in educational settings, including formal and informal science education. [6]

At first glance, Naro’s comic appears to be bright, colorful, fun and full of information. However, on closer inspection, this comic is actually little more than an educational tool, engineered to brainwash children into believing exactly what governments want them to believe.

Underneath the heading, Naro had written that:

“The risks, the misinformation, and the science behind history’s greatest life saver.”

Having never seen any real science proving that vaccinations were history’s greatest life saver, we were intrigued to discover more about exactly what science Naro had revealed.

Naro stated that:

“In 1798, smallpox was killing hundreds of thousands of people every year. Until Edward Jenner noticed that milkmaids who had contracted cowpox, a less deadly form of the disease, didn’t get smallpox. This was the first vaccine.”

We felt that this was a somewhat crude explanation of how vaccinations were invented and were astounded that this was the kind of information that our children were being taught in school, on such an important subject. For this reason, VacTruth decided to take a closer look.

To educate children about the flu vaccine, Naro explained that:

“Evolution is a constant arms race. As you become immune to invaders, the invaders adapt to try to get around your immunity. The flu is really good at this.

Each year scientists have to try to predict which flu strain will be the big one to vaccinate against.”

It appears that Naro’s comic was written in two halves. In the first half, the information that he had portrayed was brief and somewhat limited. The second half, however, in which he covered the subject of vaccines and autism, was written in immense detail and took up a total of TWELVE separate panels.

The information on the panels about vaccines and autism stated:

Panel 1:

“I heard that vaccines cause autism.”

Panel 2:

“Q. Do vaccines cause autism?

A. Nope. The myth began in 1998, when an English medical journal called The Lancet published a paper which claimed a link between autism and the Measles, Mumps, and Rubella vaccine (MMR).” 

Panel 3:

“However, after a lengthy investigation, it was discovered that the author, Andrew Wakefield, had not only fudged the data … but did a lot of other shady stuff.”

Panel 4:

“For example, he paid kids for blood samples at his son’s birthday party.”

Panel 5:

“Wakefield also had numerous conflicts of interest.”

Panel 6:

“Before publishing, he filed a patent for his own version of the MMR vaccine.”

Panel 7:

“He was paid hundreds of thousands of pounds by the UK Legal Aid Fund for his expert testimony in a class action suit against MMR manufacturers.”

Panel 8

“All of it undeclared.”

Panel 9

“Before long, celebrities like Jenny McCarthy began latching on to the scare.”

Panel 10:

“Soon it became trendy to keep your children ‘pure’ by not injecting them with ‘chemicals.’”

Panel 11:

“By the time Wakefield’s misconduct had come to light, his paper retracted … and his medical license taken away … ” (sic)

Panel 12:

“The damage was done. Now he is held up as martyr by anti-vaccine proponents.” (sic)

So, there you have it, this is the so-called science being taught to our children in school. Naro provided no studies, no statistics and as far as we were concerned, no science throughout his entire comic.

It appears that Naro’s comics were less about teaching children the truth about vaccines and more about impressing on them that Dr. Wakefield was a crook and that vaccines do not cause autism.

What makes this even worse is the fact that this is the “science” that examiners around the world are basing their exam questions on.

Is it any wonder that this little comic was backed by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation?

UK School Exam Papers Reflect Age-Old Lies

One UK mother was so shocked by her son’s recent GCSE exam papers that she decided to send them to us for our opinion.

When my son David was born in 2001, I was 23 years old and blissfully optimistic about the journey into motherhood. I had read every book about pregnancy and parenting I could find. I researched the safest vehicles and car seats for our precious angel. I bought him stacks of the best books money could buy as I knew instinctively he was to be a genius. I was ready and well prepared for the road ahead.

When David was an infant, I took him to his well-child visits armed with the confidence of the Roman Empire. When asked if I wanted to vaccinate my son, I boldly declared, “Of course I do. It would be irresponsible of me not to. I don’t understand why a parent would subject their child to preventable diseases.”

And just like that, I signed the form releasing the pediatrician from all liability if my son were to be injured or die as the result of an adverse reaction to vaccines. After signing the paper, I felt a deep sense of discord and fear well up inside of me. I paid my instincts no mind and allowed my beautiful son to receive all recommended vaccines. Vaccinating was the right thing to do and I, being of superior intellect, knew that I was doing the right thing, despite having never researched possible side effects.

In infancy, David cried incessantly, sometimes for hours at a time. In an effort to curb the crying and bloated tummy, we tried everything we could think of. We switched formulas several times, gave him Mylicon drops, rocked him, wrapped him up tightly in his blanket and manually bounced his chair (the only thing that soothed him). We did everything we could think of and yet the crying ensued.

My son, who could count to five at thirteen months, was learning the alphabet and said, “ma, da, brover, bye” and “hi,” was, in fact, a genius. The multiple stacks of books I bought him went to good use. Our days were spent looking at numbers, letters, shapes and beautiful pictures of far-away lands. His genius flourished despite his chronic GI issues, which surely caused him incredible discomfort.

At thirteen months, he received multiple vaccines at his well-child exam. Within a few days, his language, eye contact and connection to his family dissipated. He clearly had suffered an adverse reaction to his vaccines, but his pediatrician assured me that he needed to be further vaccinated to protect his health and I agreed.

At his 24 month checkup, he was vaccinated again and it was the beginning of the end of life as we knew it. Within a week or so, David became violent toward me and his dad. He, for the first time, was hitting himself in the head and banging his head on the ground. He slept very little and did not want to be bathed, have his hands washed or his clothes changed.

When I took him into the pediatrician’s office, the (now retired) doctor told me he could not have been injured by vaccines because they had been rigorously tested for safety. He told us to take him home, let him cry and have a beer if we needed to.

Despite this advice, my husband (at the time) and I knew something was very wrong with our son. We could tell he was in pain and was trying to convey this to us by pounding on his head and slamming it into the ground.

After years of specialists’ visits and countless evaluations, I realized my son would soon be too dangerous to keep at home. He was now four and was a threat to himself and others. I knew I would have to find answers myself or my son would need to be placed in a residential facility, which was something I could not live with.

Per the recommendation of a mother who had recovered her son from autism, I tested David for heavy metals commonly found in childhood vaccines. Low and behold, David had heavy metal poisoning, something every pediatric specialist had missed.

Additionally, I put his medical file in order and recognized a pattern: following many of his vaccines, I took David in to be seen for myriad reasons. One visit I reported constant crying, another visit I reported loss of language and a fever and I reported a regression of developmental skills. Putting his medical file in order allowed me to see what doctors didn’t: my son was vaccine-injured.

Here is where it gets sticky. You see, we all sign the little form stating we will not sue the pediatrician if our child is vaccine-injured. Most of us are not told that if our child is injured, the vaccine manufacturer cannot be held liable. But the financial blow is just the tip of the iceberg.

Vaccine injury doesn’t just harm your innocent child; it will make you a social leper. When you prove to your pediatrician he injured your child, he will no longer take your phone calls or see you when you come in. Your loved ones will say things like, “Well, what happened to him is rare and we still need vaccines to keep polio at bay.” (Not knowing polio was eradicated by semantics and redefining polio symptoms). [1]

When your child is vaccine-injured, you are no longer a part of any social group outside of other parents of vaccine-injured children. At church you will say, “If I had known many vaccines contain aborted fetal cells, I would not have vaccinated him.” And they will respond with something like, “Oh, well, we need vaccines to prevent measles.” (Not realizing that the measles is a benign disease that is easily treated in developed nations).

When you discuss your child’s vaccine injury with the other moms at your child’s school, you will be forced to say, “He has autism,” because if you dare say your child suffered encephalopathy causing neurological damage and severe GI distress from vaccines, you will be shunned (even though the DTaP vaccine package insert lists autism as a possible vaccine reaction). [2]

When you finally meet other parents of children with disabilities you connect with, you dare not say your child is vaccine-injured or you will be ostracized and your injured child will be left out of (even more) birthday parties and activities. You see, vaccine injury isn’t just emotionally, physically and financially devastating, it is socially devastating as well. Even other parents of children with disabilities will sometimes turn their backs on you if you have the audacity to speak your truth.

Facebook friends will mysteriously vanish, invitations to events will wane, you will get odd stares at social gatherings because suddenly you are “that crazy lady who says her child is vaccine-injured.” Watching your child suffer immeasurably after a vaccine injury is just the beginning. The road ahead is wrought with the pain of being shunned by the disability community, friends and sometimes even family.

Your child will suffer twice: First, the loss of their health as an adverse reaction and second, the loss of any chance at a social life if you dare speak your truth. You will have to make a choice to either be shamed into silence or be made strong by the brutal treatment you will receive for stating the devastating truth about your child’s failing health.

At 23 years old, I was convinced I had it all figured out. My perceived superior intellect proved to be nothing more than youthful arrogance, which reduced me to a brokenhearted, pleading and isolated woman. The Roman Army confidence I once felt was now piecemealed by the degrading tone of the Medicaid workers I had to beg for services. My once self-assured and possibly self-righteous nature was drowned by the number of people who “forgot” to invite us to an event or refused to speak to me at a social gathering.

When you sign the contract releasing your pediatrician from liability if your child is injured by a vaccine, you are signing a social contract as well. Your social contract will include missed vacations, milestone birthday parties, girl’s nights, disability-related events, weddings and family reunions.

If I could go back and give my 23 year-old, know-it-all self advice, it would be this:

Do your research, as many pediatricians do not read vaccine package inserts and cannot recognize an adverse reaction. Understand synergy and the physiological impacts of combining vaccine ingredients. Trust your God-given motherly instincts and lastly, think critically about the long-term health and social ramifications of vaccine injury.

References:

1. https://www.facebook.com/notes/shawn-siegel…
2. https://vaccines.procon.org/sourcefiles/DTaP_Tripedia.pdf

Photo Credit

Copyright 2017, Vactruth.com-All rights reserved.